Assessing loss of use – The real cost of hiring...
Motor accident disputes remain prevalent. Amidst the 'carnage' there...
News & Blog
Stay up-to-date with interesting perspectives from the team at McCabe Curwood.
Not named but still covered – subcontractor covered under Contract Works Policy
The usual limitation on cover for those subcontractors who expressly require insurance has long been thought of as being sufficient to narrow the scope of cover. A recent decision of the Western Australian Court of Appeal has confirmed that such a limitation may not apply where the 'Named Insured' includes a class of persons which the subcontractor could fall within. Author: Isabel CusumanoJudgment date: 8 August 2019Citation: Tokio Marine...
Causation without a cause
There does not need to be a direct causal link between the cause and...
Insured or Assignee – Court of Appeal highlights...
Meeting the definition of 'Insured' under a policy of insurance or...
Damage? Your time starts now!
The New South Wales Court of Appeal has confirmed time starts for the...
Not an exclusion: New South Wales Court of Appeal...
Author: Chanel Bou-Francis and Matthew McDonaldJudgement Date: 28th...
Can a claim be renewed when no steps have been...
Author: Kiley HodgesJudgement Date: 25th January, 2018Citation: King &...
The Federal Court of Australia concludes on...
Author: Yasmin BellJudgement Date: 17th November, 2017Citation:...
Insurer’s arguments all at sea – Watkins...
Author: Kiley HodgesJudgement Date: 8th November, 2016Citation:...
‘More is more’ when it comes to...
Author: Brian Trist and Carly StephensJudgement Date: 23rd May,...