To what extent is MAS obliged to compel the...
A recent decision by the Supreme Court considers whether a Review...
News & Blog
Stay up-to-date with interesting perspectives from the team at McCabe Curwood.
‘No-fault’ means no-one’s fault
Are all not‑at‑fault drivers who have sustained non‑minor injuries entitled to statutory benefits after 26 weeks, or do the deeming provisions contained in Parts 3 and 5 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 produce a different outcome for some? The Supreme Court of NSW provided eagerly‑awaited answers in AAI Limited v Singh. Author: Andrew GormanJudgment date: 27 September 2019Citation: AAI Limited v Singh [2019] NSWSC...
Does a duty of care exist to the Plaintiff if both...
It is well established that no duty of care is owed between the...
Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the...
This dispute was limited to a single issue – who was driving the...
The role of the ‘lethal weapon’ in...
When assessing contributory negligence in motor accident cases, the...
Roadblocks and roundabouts – ASIC’s review...
A review of 1.6 million claims was recently undertaken by ASIC into...
The real possibility of a conflict of interest...
A Plaintiff is assaulted and injured moments later as he fell from his...
Fault means fault
When seeking a mandatory exemption from CARS, is a denial of injury...
What is the definition of ‘uninjured’...
A recent decision by the Supreme Court considers what 'uninjured'...
What does it take for an Insurer to be found to...
An Insurer makes settlement offers without reduction for contributory...