Briggs v IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2020]...
Is procedural fairness denied if a Claimant is not put on notice that...
News & Blog
Stay up-to-date with interesting perspectives from the team at McCabe Curwood.
The need for evidence; proving the future
Can a Claims Assessor treat disputed projections of hypothetical income as "facts" in the absence of supporting evidence? Is a Claims Assessor obliged to provide adequate reasoning for their decisions? The Supreme Court recently explored these issues in Gordian Runoff Limited v Ozurumba [2020] NSWSC 774. Author: Laurette RizkJudgment date: 19 June 2020Citation: Gordian Runoff Limited v Ozurumba [2020] NSWSC 774Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of...
Claims Assessors must provide reasons for...
Is a Claims Assessor obliged to give reasons for accepting or...
Exceptional circumstances may produce exceptional...
Is a claimant who seeks statutory benefits under the Motor Accident...
No tax payable in Third Entitlement Period
Part 3 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA) includes a...
To what extent is MAS obliged to compel the...
A recent decision by the Supreme Court considers whether a Review...
Suitability vs capability – is there a...
In the recent case of NRMA v Gurbuz Aslan [2019] NSWSC 1587, the Court...
‘No-fault’ means no-one’s fault
Are all not‑at‑fault drivers who have sustained non‑minor...
Does a duty of care exist to the Plaintiff if both...
It is well established that no duty of care is owed between the...
Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the...
This dispute was limited to a single issue – who was driving the...