The real possibility of a conflict of interest...
A Plaintiff is assaulted and injured moments later as he fell from his...
News & Blog
Stay up-to-date with interesting perspectives from the team at McCabe Curwood.
Federal Court’s ‘hot’ take on ISR exclusion clause
The Federal Court, sitting in its Appellate Jurisdiction, has found in favour of the Insurer(s) in a decision concerning the interpretation of the perils exclusion in the ISR Mark IV Policy. Author(s): Benjamin Karalus and Shauntelle LimJudgment date: 24 May 2019Citation: Dalby Bio-Refinery Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2019] FCAFC 85Jurisdiction: Federal Court – Appellate JurisdictionPrinciplesThe proper meaning to be...
Do you really need a hire car?
To what extent is a Plaintiff obligated to provide particulars as to...
Don’t be a Chum(p): implement appropriate...
To what extent is a plaintiff’s contributory negligence sufficient...
Fault means fault
When seeking a mandatory exemption from CARS, is a denial of injury...
The margin of error – Interpreting GP records in...
Is an Arbitrator in the Workers Compensation Commission entitled to...
Causation without a cause
There does not need to be a direct causal link between the cause and...
A failure to remove a cable causing trip or a...
While it is implicit in the role of a civil engineer and building...
Insured or Assignee – Court of Appeal highlights...
Meeting the definition of 'Insured' under a policy of insurance or...
What is the definition of ‘uninjured’...
A recent decision by the Supreme Court considers what 'uninjured'...