The allegations include that Oscar Wylee engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false or misleading representations pertaining to its Oscar Wylee charity initiatives, which included commitments to its consumers that "[f]or every pair purchased, a pair is donated to someone in need".
The ACCC alleges that Oscar Wylee has fallen very short of its promises.
What were the representations?
The ACCC allege that during the period of 13 January 2014 to 31 December 2018, Oscar Wylee represented to consumers that it would donate a pair of glasses to a person in need for every pair purchased at Oscar Wylee. More specifically, Oscar Wylee is alleged to have made the following representations:
- "Buy a pair, give a pair";
- "For every pair purchased, a pair is donated to someone in need";
- "I care for eyecare";
- "Donate a pair today by buying a pair from @oscarwylee";
- "You buy a pair, we donate a pair"; and
the list goes on (Donation Representations
The ACCC alleges that Oscar Wylee in fact only donated 3,181 glasses, despite selling 328,010 pairs of glasses during the period of 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018. The ACCC also allege that of the glasses donated, none included prescription lenses and that Oscar Wylee only started donating glasses in significant numbers in early 2019.
In addition to the above, the ACCC is also alleging that during the period of 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018, Oscar Wylee separately represented that it held close affiliations with Rose Charities, a charity which "helps build sustainable eye care programs in Cambodia". The ACCC claims that a video Oscar Wylee published online from January 2014 to December 2018 represented that it was closely associated with Rose Charities (Rose Charities Representations). However, the ACCC allege that Oscar Wylee only made one donation of $2,000 and gifted 100 spectacle frames to Rose Charities in early 2014.
Alleged contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law
The relevant law which the ACCC alleges Oscar Wylee has contravened is as follows
What relief is sought by the ACCC?
The ACCC is seeking a wide range of relief against Oscar Wylee – inclusive of declarations, pecuniary penalties, injunctions, corrective publication orders as well as orders compelling the undertaking of a compliance program.
What you can learn from the ACCC's allegations?
McCabe Curwood has a wide range of experience dealing with compliance with the Australian Consumer Law. If you need advice on any area raised in this article, get in touch with us today.
- The ACCC's case against Oscar Wylee serves as a timely reminder for businesses to review and understand the position at law when making representations in the ordinary course of business. One question a business must ask itself, is whether it can substantiate the representations that are being made.
- The ACCC have wide-spanning information gathering powers that could have been exercised to obtain indicative data from Oscar Wylee such as the total number glasses it has sold, the total number of glasses it donated and its monetary donations to Rose Charities. Check out our article 'Facing the music of the ACCC's section 155 notice' on these powers.
- Finally, it is crucial to remember that harm to consumers is not the test for a contravention of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, as conduct that is "likely", but has yet, to mislead or deceive will constitute a breach of that section.